“I am mandated to perform my job’”
Councilor Melchor “Mel” Saddain said.
Saddain who chairs the
Committee on Good Government together with four (4) other members
said that , they failed to get the majority of vote of eight (8) .
How did this happened and where did
the “majority rule” characteristics of democratic institution came into play in
the case?
The councilors who voted in favor
for a “preventive suspension “ were Councilors Rommel,
Agan, Myra Paz Abubbakar , Juan Kim Elago, Jawo Jimenez,
Ismael Musa, Percival Ramos and Mel Saddain.
They made up a total of seven votes.
Those who voted against the
“preventive suspension” were Councilors Vincent Paul Elago , Charlie
Mariano , Roel Natividad, Jerry Perez, Eddie Saavedra and Rudy Bayot .
They made up a total of six votes.
It appeared that under the city
council rule for a majority of the 16 member city council, the votes should
have at least reached 8 votes as a
majority to carry a resolution or a decision.
Councilor Noning Biel
abstained while three (3) others, Councilors Gerky Valesco, VG Guingona
and Mike Alavar were absent on official travel.
Sadain said that it his job
though it is hard and or difficult but it is part of the
procedural process based on documentary evidence and
witnesses resistance .
“Duele man , trabaho lang, “ Sadain
said .
As this developed, Sadain said he
will still respect the decision of the members of the City Council .
The committee on Good
Government chairs by Saddain included
Co-Chairman Charlie Mariano with members , Councilor Myra Paz Abubakar ,
Councilor Percival Ramos and Councilor VG Guingona whom only three
signed for the recommendation.
Only three councilors signed the
recommendation, namely Ramos, , Guingona and Sadain and who opted
to present the preventive
suspension resolution so as not to
influence the testimonies of the witnesses and for the
committee to be able to get hold
of the original documents in the course of their investigation .
Councilor Charlie Mariano
and Myra Paz Abubakar were out for travel at the time to sign
the recommendation for a preventive suspension .
Saddain added that the committee is
saddled with two complaitns.
The first case has 17 complainants
wjhile the second case has only three complainants.
Saddain said that actually
the committee already received the referral coming from the
Ombudsman which then has referred to the councilor committee
.
“We are just waiting the
answers from the respondents. “Sadain said .
The time frame for the respondents to
answer summon on the case filed against them is good for
fifteen days upon received thereof. (Letty M. Militante) (112814)
0 comments:
Post a Comment